Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:414Hits:19940734Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID157477
Title ProperSub- and trans-national actors in South Korea's island disputes
Other Title Informationthe cases of Dokdo and Iodo
LanguageENG
AuthorChung, Chien-Peng ;  Park, Jeongwon Bourdais
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper provides a political analysis on two territorial disputes that South Korea has with Japan over Dokdo/Takeshima and with China over Iŏdo/Suyan Rocks, as well as on their implications for the Northeast Asia region, focusing on the roles of sub-state actors and the United States as a third party trans-national actor. It mainly explores why South Koreans consider territorial claims by Japan and China such an affront as to require strident demonstration of ownership, especially since they already exercise effective control over the territories under dispute. It also explores what actions the South Korean government would take in the event of maneuvers or attempted landings by security forces or nationalists/fishing boats from China on Iŏdo or Japan on Dokdo. Employing Robert Putnam's Two Level Game Framework, the paper provides comparative insights on how these cases have been developed to date through interactions between Level I, official negotiators, and Level II, sub- and trans-national actors. The two cases demonstrate that the state is not a unified actor, and non-state actors' nationalistic collective sentiment has played (and will play) a greater role in shaping the directions of (potential) conflicts over Dokdo and Iŏdo.
`In' analytical NoteAsian Affairs: An American Review Vol. 44, No.1-4; Jan-Dec 2017: p.9-29
Journal SourceAsian Affairs: An American Review Vol: 44 No 1-4
Key WordsDokdo/Takeshima ;  Lodo/Suyan Rocks ;  Irredentism and Nationalism ;  Territorial Disputes in Northeast Asia ;  Two-Level Analysis


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text