| ID | 157533 |
| Title Proper | Studying small states in international security affairs |
| Other Title Information | a quantitative analysis |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Panke, Diana |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Todays’ international security architecture composed of international security treaties and international security norms has been established and formalized by negotiations. Owing to the great importance of international security negotiations for international security practices, this paper sheds light on negotiation activities. A study of 100 different international security negotiations shows that states vary considerably with respect to their negotiation activity. Some countries voice positions very often, while others remain completely silent. This is puzzling, as active negotiation participation is an expression of state sovereignty and a means to influence the shape of the international security architecture. The article distinguishes between capacity and incentives as driving forces of state activity in international security negotiations. The analysis reveals that, next to political and financial capacities, states that place high priority on military matters are more active, while smaller and poorer states are more likely to shelter under the security umbrella of larger counterparts. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol. 30, No.2-3; Apr-Jun 2017: p.235-255 |
| Journal Source | Cambridge Review of International Affairs Vol: 30 No 2-3 |
| Key Words | International Security ; Small States ; International Security Treaties ; International Security Negotiations |