Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:852Hits:18968547Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID157608
Title ProperBefore the vote
Other Title InformationUK foreign policy discourse on Syria 2011–13
LanguageENG
AuthorRalph, Jason ;  Holland, Jack ;  Zhekova, Kalina
Summary / Abstract (Note)The literature of recent UK policy toward Syria focuses on the 2013 chemical weapons crisis. We examine policy discourses leading up to that. The government supported the removal of Assad but faced the challenge of explaining how that would be realised. Given its unwillingness and inability to mobilise support for military intervention, or to tailor policy goals to match available means, government strategy arguably lacked credibility. Our purpose is to examine how the government tried to close this ends means gap and how, having failed to do that, its ‘discursive strategy’ legitimised its approach. We argue the resources for the government’s discursive strategy on Syria can be found in the earlier articulation of ‘liberal conservatism’. A policy that from an ideal-liberal or ideal-conservative position might have been criticised as half-baked was maintained by a strategy that gave consideration to, but did not completely follow through on, either archetype. Drawing on an analysis of 2,152 sources and supplemented by elite interviews, we illustrate how this strategy managed the interplay of two basic discourses: a liberal insistence that the UK should support ‘the Arab Spring’ and a conservative insistence that military intervention was imprudent because ‘Syria was not Libya’.
`In' analytical NoteReview of International Studies Vol. 43, No.5; Dec 2017: p. 875-897
Journal SourceReview of International Studies Vol: 43 No 5
Key WordsMilitary Intervention ;  Syria ;  United Kingdom ;  Foreign Policy ;  Chemical Weapons Crisis ;  Discursive Strategy


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text