Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1359Hits:18841670Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID157677
Title ProperDiscursive battlefields
Other Title Informationsupport(ing) the troops in Canada
LanguageENG
AuthorWegner, Nicole
Summary / Abstract (Note)Winning hearts and minds in counterinsurgency missions is not only a strategy to be used on foreign populations, but also one that is necessary on the “home front.” This article is focused on the home battlefield; it is an analysis of the efforts by Canadian political elites to justify the use of military resources during the 2001–2011 interventions in Afghanistan. To fully understand Canadian public opinion of the Afghanistan war requires assessing domestic discursive “battlefields.” This article examines domestic debates as a key “battleground” in the war to win public consent for Afghanistan. I argue that the absence of active resistance to military involvement in the Afghan mission can best be explained by examining discourse about Support(ing) the Troops, the effect of which was to censure anti-war voices. In short, despite public discontent about the war, Support the Troops discourse was manoeuvred in a way that stigmatized anti-war narratives. This article considers how the rhetoric of Support the Troops movements in Canada played a role in normalizing militarization, and how this discourse was manoeuvred to legitimize military activities in Afghanistan.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Journal Vol. 72, No.4; Dec 2017: p.444-462
Journal SourceInternational Journal Vol: 72 No 4
Key WordsAfghanistan ;  Militarization ;  Public relations ;  Canadian Foreign Policy ;  Support The Troops


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text