Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:837Hits:19860037Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID158257
Title ProperOpposite but compatible nationalisms
Other Title Informationa neoclassical realist approach to the future of US–China relations
LanguageENG
AuthorSchweller, Randall
Summary / Abstract (Note)China’s new assertiveness and the sudden inward turn of United States are a function of causes located in both the second and third images. The key second-image variable is nationalism, which combines with the power trajectories (a third-image variable) of both China and the United States to define how their relationship will unfold in the coming years. The interaction between nationalism and power trajectory produces entirely different foreign policy orientations in rising and declining powers—the former embraces an outward-looking, extroverted foreign policy of expansion, while the latter adopts an inward-looking, introverted foreign policy of restraint and retrenchment. The resurgent nationalisms of the rising challenger and the declining hegemon are entirely compatible with a future relationship characterized by peace and harmony. Obviously, the two nationalisms pose no inherent conflict of interests: China currently wants more global influence; the Unites States wants less. Hence, there is good reason to expect a soft landing as the world moves from unipolarity to bipolarity.
`In' analytical NoteChinese Journal of International Politics Vol. 11, No.1; Spring 2018: p.23–48
Journal SourceChinese Journal of International Politics Vol: 11 No 1
Key WordsUS–China Relations ;  Compatible Nationalisms ;  Neoclassical Realist Approach


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text