| ID | 158281 |
| Title Proper | Global governance |
| Other Title Information | a struggle over universal values |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Pouliot, Vincent ; Vincent Pouliot Jean-Philippe Thérien ; Thérien, Jean-Philippe |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Why is it so complicated to achieve collective action in global governance? This article focuses on one explanatory factor, according to which the global stage is pervaded by normative divisions. Our article helps advance this argument in three ways, by specifying the nature, scope, and mechanics of the global value struggle. First, we show that the distinct visions that clash in the conduct of global governance are formulated in a peculiar idiom of universal values based on contending and polysemous conceptions of the common good. Second, we highlight the ubiquity of universal value claims in global governance debates; regardless of their specific nature or standing, actors of all stripes defend their positions by referring to a certain understanding of the general interest. Third and finally, we specify the mechanics of the global value struggle as actors use the idiom of universal values to communicate and justify their viewpoints publicly. We illustrate our framework by looking into the debates that have structured two prominent cases of global policymaking at the United Nations: the adoption of the Millennium Development Goals and the negotiations over the reform of the Security Council. Overall, the article helps make sense of a counterintuitive dynamic in contemporary world politics: as it attempts to depoliticize global governance, the idiom of universal values actually ends up bringing politics back to the fore. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Studies Review Vol. 20, No.1; Mar 2018: p. 55–73 |
| Journal Source | International Studies Review Vol: 20 No 1 |
| Key Words | Global Governance ; Discourse ; Normative Theory |