Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:601Hits:19894886Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID158290
Title ProperBetween Co-Option and Radical Opposition
Other Title InformationA Comparative Analysis of Power-Sharing on Gender Equality and LGBTQ rights in Northern Ireland and Lebanon
LanguageENG
AuthorNagle, John ;  Fakhoury, Tamirace
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article provides a comparative analysis of two types of power-sharing: Lebanon's corporate version and Northern Ireland's relatively liberal arrangements. Our aim is to explore whether these power-sharing institutions augment or stymie gender and LGBTQ equality, while also illuminating the complex ways in which LGBTQ movements conceptualize power-sharing. We argue that while Northern Ireland's liberal arrangements, predicated on a minority rights regime, theoretically offer opportunities for gender and LGBTQ mobilization and equality, these rights claims are frustrated as they become embroiled in the wider ethnonational conflict for group rights. In Lebanon's corporate system, alternatively, where gender and LGBTQ rights are absent, feminist and LGBTQ movements identify power-sharing as institutionalizing patriarchy and homophobia and thus engage in a radical campaign of opposition to consociationalism.
`In' analytical Note
Nationalism and Ethnic Politics Vol. 24, No.1; Jan-Mar 2018: p.82-99
Journal SourceNationalism and Ethnic Politics Vol: 24 No 1
Key WordsComparative Analysis ;  Radical Opposition ;  Power-Sharing on Gender Equality ;  LGBTQ Rights ;  Northern Ireland and Lebanon


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text