| ID | 158991 |
| Title Proper | Choosing air strikes |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Allen, Susan Hannah ; Machain, Carla Martinez |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Under what conditions do states choose to use only air power? Air strikes are one of many tools states use to promote their interests in the international system. Given that not all policy tools are appropriate for all crises, we explore when states choose to use air strikes as a coercive tool. We empirically test both common perceptions and newly derived hypotheses on the characteristics of states that employ air-only campaigns and the settings in which they do so, using newly collected data on the uses of air power during international crises between 1908 and 2006. Looking at the events that trigger the crises and the salience of the issues at stake, alongside the characteristics of the states involved, provides a clearer picture of when states use air power versus other coercive tools. Our research indicates that air-only campaigns are more likely to be initiated by militarily powerful states, but that in higher stakes crises, states are more likely to use ground troops or ground and air forces in combination. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Global security Studies Vol. 3, No.2; Apr 2018: p.150–162 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Global security Studies Vol: 3 No 2 |
| Key Words | Coercion ; Crisis Escalation ; Air Power |