| ID | 159190 |
| Title Proper | South African defence policy |
| Other Title Information | the rationale and impact of the SANDF’s primary role and conventional force design |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Jordaan, Evert |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The 2015 South African Defence Review set out to reverse the deterioration of South African National Defence Force (SANDF) capabilities. Within the South African Department of Defence (DOD) this deterioration is expressed mainly in terms of a decreasing defence budget, subsequent declining conventional capabilities and obsolete prime mission equipment. Contemporary research and defence expert debates on this theme, point out the disjuncture between policy ends and the available means, with scepticism for an increased defence budget given the DOD’s lack of internal reform and strategy adjustment. One question that remains largely unanswered in the literature regarding the decline of the SANDF, is why both the policy-makers and the SANDF have remained focused on the primary role of the military (defending territorial integrity) accompanied with an unaffordable conventional force design? This question relates to the aim of this paper and is explored by revisiting initial defence policy decisions and compromises that were made in the 1990s. It is argued that the primary role of the SANDF and its conventional force design suited the interests of both the politicians and the military, but that the drawbacks thereof have harshly caught up with the DOD. |
| `In' analytical Note | Defence Studies Vol. 18, No.2; Jun 2018: p.188-206 |
| Journal Source | Defence Studies Vol: 18 No 2 |
| Key Words | Defence Policy ; Budget ; Capabilities ; Force Design ; SAND ; Primary Role |