| ID | 159354 |
| Title Proper | Coping with crisis |
| Other Title Information | Southeast Asian regionalism and the ideational constraints of reform |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Rüland, Jürgen |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The key argument of this article is that during serious crises and external shocks, societal actors do not necessarily follow the predictions of theories on ideational change. This literature argues that crises and external shocks spur ideational change as expectations associated with the old order are no longer met. A study of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) shows that the Asian financial crisis of 1997/1998 stimulated a reform debate but that this discourse did not facilitate paradigmatic changes in the region’s repository of cooperation norms. What at first sight appeared to be an accelerating Europeanization of Southeast Asian regionalism proved to be a process involving the retention of major elements of the region’s “cognitive prior.” New ideas of regional integration have at best been emulated or localized, but have not led to a thorough transformation of Southeast Asian cooperation norms. This must be attributed to the entrenched nature of the region’s cognitive prior epitomized by the worldviews of political decision-makers who regard the external world as essentially hostile. This belief has been reproduced many times in the political experiences of the region’s foreign policy elites—not least by the Asian Financial Crisis—thus confirming the ideational orthodoxy that national sovereignty provides the best protection for nation states. A deepening of regional integration is faced with major ideational obstacles under these conditions. |
| `In' analytical Note | Asia Europe Journal Vol. 16, No.2; Jun 2018: p.155–168 |
| Journal Source | Asia Europe Journal Vol: 16 No 2 |
| Key Words | Reform ; Southeast Asian Regionalism ; Ideational Constraints |