ID | 159531 |
Title Proper | Phoning it in |
Other Title Information | overcoming implementation challenges in field-experiment partnerships |
Language | ENG |
Author | Calfano, Brian Robert |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | The use of field experiments in political science has become extensive, but the promise of conducting a randomized intervention in a “real world” setting also raises perils for researchers. Partnering with organizations to deliver a randomized intervention may be a cost effective route to data collection, but a long-distance partnership presents certain challenges. In particular, the researcher needs to be especially vigilant about treatment application given the potential for noncompliance with the random assignment schedule. I provide an evaluation of a field intervention’s effectiveness where the long-distance partner organization inadvertently violated the random assignment of voter precincts in a canvassing effort prior to a citizen vote to repeal a non-discrimination housing ordinance protecting LGBT residents of a Midwestern city. I then provide recommendations for researchers to help mitigate treatment noncompliance when they cannot be present during treatment delivery. |
`In' analytical Note | Political Science and Politics Vol. 51, No.2; Apr 2018: p.410-415 |
Journal Source | Political Science and Politics 2018-06 51, 2 |
Key Words | Overcoming Implementation Challenges ; Field-Experiment Partnerships |