Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1173Hits:19100503Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID159674
Title ProperAdd Vietnamese people and stir?
Other Title Informationa reflection on burns’s and novick’s the vietnam war and a call for new interpretations
LanguageENG
AuthorTran, Nu-Anh
Summary / Abstract (Note)To a serious student of Vietnamese history, Ken Burns’s and Lynn Novick’s The Vietnam War is both refreshing and maddeningly unimaginative. Perhaps the most outstanding feature of the mini-series is the inclusion of politically diverse Vietnamese voices. The film boasts a rich tapestry of interviews with North and South Vietnamese veterans, communist guerilla fighters, and Vietnamese refugees. Their stories are interwoven with more familiar accounts of American soldiers, protestors, and government officials. Although the filmmakers give more airtime to American perspectives, The Vietnam War does a far better job of acknowledging competing Vietnamese viewpoints than most documentaries. Burns and Novick hoped that this “many sides” approach would convey the multifaceted complexity of the war. As they write in the companion volume to the documentary, “From the start, we vowed to each other that we would avoid the limits of a binary political perspective and the shortcuts of conventional wisdom and superficial history. This was a war of many perspectives, a Rashomon of equally plausible ‘stories,’ of secrets, lies, and distortions at every turn.”1
`In' analytical NoteDiplomatic History Vol. 42, No.3; Jun 2018: p.406–410
Journal SourceDiplomatic History Vol: 42 No 3
Key WordsVietnam War ;  Vietnamese People


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text