Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:599Hits:19921581Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID160006
Title ProperLimits of market power in shaping international regulatory cooperation
Other Title Information path dependence and loss avoidance in the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations
LanguageENG
AuthorCorning, Gregory P
Summary / Abstract (Note)What factors shape the ability of the United States to negotiate international regulatory cooperation? This paper discusses three theoretical approaches that help to explain the potential for regulatory change – market power, historical institutionalism, and loss avoidance – and applies them to the negotiation of regulatory issues in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP). It seeks to understand why the regulatory disciplines in some TPP chapters were more rigorous than those in other chapters. Focusing on case-studies of the chapters on state-owned enterprises and regulatory coherence, the paper argues that the market power of the United States is more likely to secure stronger regulatory disciplines when there is: (1) a strong loss avoidance coalition in the USA pushing for change, and (2) a weakly institutionalized regulatory framework among parties in a given issue area that makes path dependence less important.
`In' analytical NotePacific Review Vol. 31, No.1; Jan 2018: p.1-19
Journal SourcePacific Review Vol: 31 No 1
Key WordsPath Dependence ;  State-Owned Enterprise ;  Trans-Pacific Partnership ;  International Regulatory Cooperation ;  Loss Avoidance


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text