| ID | 160009 |
| Title Proper | Proceeding in hardship |
| Other Title Information | the trilateralism–bilateralism nexus and the institutional evolution of China–Japan–South Korea trilateralism |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Zhang, Muhui |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In recent decades, the development of trilateral institutions among China, Japan and South Korea has begun to take shape. This study analyzes its strengths and weaknesses with regard to the nexus between trilateralism and bilateralism. A well-functioning trilateral grouping needs to overcome two structural limitations – dilution effects and bilateral constraints – both of which are triggered by embedded bilateral approaches. The critical juncture approach is effective in terms of elevating the payoffs of cooperative trilateralism during times of exigency. However, once common crises have dissipated, trilateralism has revealed starkly different performances with respect to functional and political-diplomatic cooperation. This article adopts a dichotomous approach between the two. Functional trilateralism has been steadily growing, and has proven to be less subject to fluctuations in the nations’ political relationships. Its outcomes are positive and worthy of praise. However, the outcomes of trilateralism have been less convincing in fields of middle and high politics. Trilateralism is overwhelmingly subject to fluctuations when its embedded bilateral relations change, and cooperative outcomes within a trilateral grouping are prone to being diluted by bilateral approaches. China–Japan–Korea trilateralism at diplomatic levels remains more an extension of bilateral relations than a mature form of minilateral arrangement. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Review Vol. 31, No.1; Jan 2018: p.57-75 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Review Vol: 31 No 1 |
| Key Words | Japan ; China ; South Korea ; Institution-Building ; Trilateralism, Bilateralism |