Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:515Hits:20381542Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID160334
Title ProperSimulating Redistricting in the Classroom
Other Title InformationA Binding Arbitration Decision Game Using Louisiana Census Data
LanguageENG
AuthorMiller, Peter
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article describes the design and implementation of a redistricting simulation in two classes at a large university. Simulations often include a high degree of abstraction and, as a result, may not inform and develop an understanding of how the world operates. We developed a binding-arbitration game, based on the New Jersey model of a bipartisan commission, in which groups of students used US Census data and a set of mandatory and discretionary criteria to design congressional districts in Louisiana as well as advocate for their plan at an open hearing. In so doing, they learned about the complexities of redistricting and were introduced to geographical information systems (GIS). The student-drawn maps, on average, were more compact and preserved a larger proportion of places and parishes in a single district than the legislature-drawn map. The article discusses other features of the students’ maps and concludes with comments on the general decision-game design.
`In' analytical NotePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 51, No.3; Jul 2018: p.664-668
Journal SourcePolitical Science and Politics 2018-09 51, 3
Key WordsSimulating Redistricting in the Classroom