| ID | 160478 |
| Title Proper | Aligning with the UN |
| Other Title Information | Nonviolent Self-Determination Movements in the Global South |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Granzow, Tanja ; Sändig, Jan ; Jan Sändig Tanja Granzow |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Self-determination campaigns in the Global South have often been pursued through warfare. Since the 1990s, however, an increasing number of such movements have endorsed legalistic mechanisms of international law and the UN's core principle of nonviolence. We introduce the concept of UN-aligned self-determination movements for them. As a starting point to explain their occurrence, we examine two major cases: The Peaceful Southern Movement (Hirak) in Yemen and the Movement for the Actualization of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB) in contemporary Nigeria. Our analysis combines theories on political opportunities, diffusion, and framing from social movement, civil resistance, and armed rebellion research. We observe that since the end of the Cold War the rule of law, role of the UN, and norms of nonviolent conflict resolution have been strengthened in the international system. We argue that this has given self-determination movements in the Global South new opportunities for claims-making: Facing repressive governments, the leaders of Hirak and MASSOB have successfully aligned their movements with the UN by diffusing its core principles to the local struggle through resonant collective action frames. Thereby, our study contributes to understanding the diffusion of nonviolence in the international system, in particular in self-determination campaigns, and directs attention to the rise of UN-aligned self-determination movements. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Global security Studies Vol. 3, No.3; Jul 2018: p.322–338 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Global security Studies Vol: 3 No 3 |
| Key Words | Nonviolence ; Yemen ; Social Movements ; Diffusion ; Biafra ; United Nations |