Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:554Hits:20537268Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID160525
Title ProperPsychological Barriers to a Peaceful Resolution
Other Title InformationLongitudinal Evidence from the Middle East and Northern Ireland
LanguageENG
AuthorCanetti, Daphna
Summary / Abstract (Note)Does individual-level exposure to political violence prompt conciliatory attitudes? Does the answer vary by phase of conflict? The study uses longitudinal primary datasets to test the hypothesis that conflict-related experiences impact conciliation. Data were collected from Israeli Jews, Palestinians, and Protestants and Catholics in Northern Ireland. Across both contexts, and among both parties to each conflict, psychological distress and threat perceptions had a polarizing effect on conciliatory preferences. The study highlights that experiences of political violence are potentially a crucial source of psychological distress, and consequently, a continuing barrier to peace. This has implications in peacemaking, implying that alongside removing the real threat of violence, peacemakers must also work toward the social and political inclusion of those most affected by previous violence.
`In' analytical NoteStudies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 41, No.7-9; Jul-Sep 2018: p.660-676
Journal SourceStudies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol: 41 No 7-9
Key WordsMiddle East ;  Northern Ireland ;  Peaceful Resolution ;  Psychological Barriers ;  Longitudinal Evidence


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text