Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:483Hits:20421878Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID160773
Title ProperBeyond norms
Other Title Informationa configurational analysis of the EU’s Arab spring sanctions
LanguageENG
AuthorBoogaerts, Andreas ;  Andreas Boogaerts
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper explores and explains the EU’s use of sanctions in response to the Arab Spring in 13 Middle East and North Africa (MENA) states. A Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) shows that a combination of historical factors and human rights violations contributed to the EU’s decision to impose sanctions in Libya and Syria, while transitional void seems to have been the most important trigger for sanctions in Egypt and Tunisia. The absence of both transitional void and historical economic coercion explains why the EU has refrained from imposing sanctions in negative cases such as Saudi Arabia and Bahrain. Exposing the complex causality of the EU’s Arab Spring sanctions, this paper nuances the EU’s self-proclaimed normative foreign policy approach and demonstrates that combinations of factors matter for explaining the EU’s decision to invoke sanctions in the MENA region.
`In' analytical Note
Foreign Policy Analysis Vol.14, No.3; Jul 2018: p.408–428
Journal SourceForeign Policy Analysis 2018-09 14, 3
Key WordsConfigurational Analysis ;  EU’s Arab Spring Sanctions