| ID | 160869 |
| Title Proper | Power through Collaboration |
| Other Title Information | Stakeholder Influence in EU Climate and Energy Negotiations |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Ydersbond, Inga Margrete |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Who gets what in high-level European Union (EU) negotiations and how? This study draws on data concerning stakeholder preferences during heated negotiations leading to the EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework. It tests the explanatory values of Liberal Intergovernmentalism (LI), the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), and Historical Institutionalism (HI). Large member states were key (LI). However, coordinated groups of member states, bound by specific common interests, also played crucial roles. ACF explains the 2030 Framework only if: a) the decisive coalitions consisted of the EU’s supranational institutions, the coordinated groups of member states and long-term advocacy coalitions in the interest group community; b) coalition members held comparatively similar views; and c) coalition members adjusted their strategies mutually and/or shared information. The European Commission set the agenda (HI). The analysis demonstrates that LI, HI and ACF may be used as complementary analytical tools, filling several of each other’s gaps. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Negotiation Vol. 23, No.3; 2018: p.478 – 514 |
| Journal Source | International Negotiation Vol: 23 No 3 |
| Key Words | European Union ; Negotiations ; Interest Groups ; EU Integration ; Advocacy Coalitions ; Theory Testing ; Climate and Energy |