Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:333Hits:19953579Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID161171
Title ProperSeperating intervention from regime change
Other Title InformationChina's diplomatic innovations at the UN Security Council regarding the Syris crisis
LanguageENG
AuthorFung, Courtney J
Summary / Abstract (Note)China's response to the recent Syria crisis at the UN Security Council represents a crucial case in China's approach to intervention in that it breaks from China's recent practice of becoming more permissive regarding intervention. Instead, China actively worked to ensure that a firm line was drawn to separate intervention from foreign-imposed regime change. It did so by employing three diplomatic innovations: exercising multiple, successive vetoes; expanding discourse to delegitimize intervention as “regime change” by Western powers; and engaging in norm-shaping of the international community's “responsibility to protect” post-intervention. Together, these three innovations highlight China's desire to firmly separate the intervention norm from that of regime change. Using a variety of primary sources, the article also draws insights from interviews with foreign policy elites in Beijing, New York and New Delhi.
`In' analytical NoteChina Quarterly Vol. 235; Sept 2018: p.693-712
Journal SourceChina Quarterly No 235
Key WordsIntervention ;  Syria ;  China ;  Un Security Council ;  UNSC ;  Norms ;  Regime Change ;  Responsibility to Protect ;  Syria Crisis ;  United Nations ;  Diplomatic Innovations - China


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text