| ID | 161362 |
| Title Proper | Professionalizing protest |
| Other Title Information | scientific capital and advocacy in trade politics |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | A range of socio-economic dislocations have spawned renewed interest in the capitalist system and its critiques. Within these trends, the politics of international trade has often been a flashpoint for civil society organisations (CSOs) concerned with social justice. This paper uncovers a neglected feature of this landscape: how, since the 1980s, certain CSOs have shifted from being ‘radical outsiders’ to ‘reformist insiders’ to protest the design and purpose of global trade. We know why CSOs have criticised the political economy of trade, but less about how they have historically struggled to gain admission into this policy milieu; their internal strategising and tensions; and what makes for effective protest. To understand such experimentation, this paper argues that literature on professionalisation offers a valuable lens for exploring the relationship between expertise and power. Dovetailing with other research in IPS, it adapts Bourdieu's comparatively underused concept of scientific capital to explicate how certain, prized dispositional qualities were acquired and practiced for the purpose of registering policy impact. This argument is developed through the case of Oxfam. When viewed historically, the paper suggests that a professionalised, activist subjectivity has emerged within certain CSOs, defined here under a new ideal-type notion of the ‘critical technician’. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Political Sociology Vol. 12, No.3; Sep 2018: p.233–255 |
| Journal Source | International Political Sociology 2018-09 12, 3 |
| Key Words | Trade politics ; Professionalizing Protest ; Scientific Capital |