| ID | 161563 |
| Title Proper | To revise or not to revise |
| Other Title Information | the ‘peace constitution’, pro-revision movement, and Japan's national identity |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Ryu, Yongwook |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Why do conservative nationalists in Japan continuously seek to revise the constitution despite the past failures, and what is the likelihood of successful revision and its impact on Japan's norm of pacifism and its use of force? The article offers an analytical framework for the issue based on national pride and national security, and argues that the ‘revisionists’ seek to create a new national identity, one that infuses a greater sense of national pride among the public and enables the exercise of collective self-defense, thereby removing Japan's postwar psychological and institutional limitations on nationalism and military activities. The LDP's 2012 draft is most explicit and ambitious in this regard, with the current revision attempt under Abe having the highest chance of success since the 1950s. Successful revision would significantly expand Japan's security activities, particularly within the framework of the US–Japan Security Alliance, and entail the end of Japan's unique postwar institutionalized pacifism, although the norm of pacifism will linger on as a constitutional principle. For a smoother return to the international military scene, the Japanese government must distance itself from historical revisionism and utilize its enhanced military role to promote regional public goods rather than merely protecting its narrow national interests. |
| `In' analytical Note | Pacific Review Vol. 31, No.5; Sep 2018: p.655-672 |
| Journal Source | Pacific Review Vol: 31 No 5 |
| Key Words | Nationalism ; Constitutional Revision ; Peace Constitution ; Article Nine ; Japan's Foreign and Security Policy |