| ID | 162433 |
| Title Proper | Was something rotten in the state of Denmark? three narratives of the active internationalism in Danish foreign policy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Pedersen, Rasmus |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The Danish decision to enter US-led coalitions in Afghanistan and Iraq significantly consolidated and strengthened the Atlantic dimension in Danish foreign policy in the period 2001–2009. The period has attracted considerable academic interest, but there seems to be a lack of consensus about how to interpret the Danish decision, which has been characterised as everything from an indication of adaptation, to continuation of the Danish acquiescence to great powers, to path-breaking change in Danish foreign policy to an expression of small state independence. Part of the confusion in the literature is due to the lack of clear conceptual awareness regarding the concepts in use. This article identifies three frames in the literature and contributes to our understanding of the question of change and continuity in small state foreign and security policy by identifying the analytical implications of adopting a clearer understanding of analytical concepts such as adaptation, determinism, activism and internationalism in the Scandinavian context in general and the Danish context more specifically. |
| `In' analytical Note | Cooperation and Conflict Vol. 53, No.4; Dec 2018: p.449-466 |
| Journal Source | Cooperation and Conflict 2018-12 53, 4 |
| Key Words | Internationalism ; Denmark ; Activism ; Determinism ; Adaptation ; Foreign Policy |