| ID | 162441 |
| Title Proper | Tying Hands, Sinking Costs, and Leader Attributes |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Yarhi-Milo, Keren |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Do costly signals work? Despite their widespread popularity, both hands-tying and sunk-cost signaling have come under criticism, and there’s little direct evidence that leaders understand costly signals the way our models tell us they should. We present evidence from a survey experiment fielded on a unique sample of elite decision makers from the Israeli Knesset. We find that both types of costly signaling are effective in shaping assessments of resolve for both leaders and the public. However, although theories of signaling tend to assume homogenous audiences, we show that leaders vary significantly in how credible they perceive signals to be, depending on their foreign policy dispositions, rather than their levels of military or political experience. Our results thus encourage international relations scholars to more fully bring heterogeneous recipients into our theories of signaling and point to the important role of dispositional orientations for the study of leaders. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 62, No.10; Nov 2018: p.2150-2179 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 62 No 10 |
| Key Words | Leaders ; Political Psychology ; Experiments ; Signaling |