| ID | 162761 |
| Title Proper | Rethinking secrecy in cyberspace |
| Other Title Information | the politics of voluntary attribution |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Poznansky, Michael ; Perkoski, Evan ; Michael Poznansky Evan Perkoski |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Cyberspace affords actors unprecedented opportunities to carry out operations under a cloak of anonymity. Why do perpetrators sometimes forgo these opportunities and willingly claim credit for attacks? To date, the literature has done little to explain this variation. This article explores the motivations behind voluntary credit-claiming for the two main actors in cyberspace: states and politically motivated nonstate actors. We argue that states are most likely to claim credit for their operations and to do so privately when the goal is to coerce an opponent. Nonstate actors tend to publicly claim credit for their attacks in order to showcase their capabilities, influence public opinion, and grow their ranks. We use case narratives to assess the plausibility of our argument and find strong support. This article places cyberspace operations in conversation with the larger literature on secrecy in international relations and advances a common framework for understanding how both states and nonstate actors operate in this evolving domain. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Global security Studies Vol. 3, No.4; Oct 2018: p.402–416 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Global security Studies Vol: 3 No 4 |
| Key Words | Cyber Warfare ; Coercion ; Nonstate Actors ; Secrecy |