Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:596Hits:20115973Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID163367
Title ProperChina’s role in the regional and international management of Korean conflict
Other Title Informationan arbiter or catalyst?
LanguageENG
AuthorMehmetcik, Hakan ;  Belder, Ferit
Summary / Abstract (Note)There are diverging assessments of China’s role in resolving the nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula. China’s role has been characterised variously as a bystander, arbiter, catalyst and mediator over the years. This paper aims to clarify where China stands on North Korea and assesses the different phases of the Chinese approach to conflict resolution during the North Korean nuclear crisis. The main argument is that China wishes to maintain the regional status quo while appearing to adjust its position in line with the international community. China’s current duplicity stems from its different priorities and concerns to the remainder of the world, and can best be explained using a role theory analysis.
`In' analytical NoteThird World Quarterly Vol. 39, 12, Dec-2018; p2255-2271
Journal SourceThird World Quarterly Vol: 39 No 12
Key WordsConflict Management ;  China ;  North Korea ;  Role Theory ;  North Korean Nuclear Crisis


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text