Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:509Hits:19969241Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID163499
Title ProperNo peace, no war’ proponents? How pro-regime militias affect civil war termination and outcomes
LanguageENG
AuthorAliyev, Huseyn
Summary / Abstract (Note)Previous research on non-state actors involved in civil wars has tended to disregard the role of extra-dyad agents in influencing conflict outcomes. Little is known as to whether the presence of such extra-dyadic actors as pro-regime militias affects conflict termination and outcomes. This article develops and tests a number of hypotheses on the pro-government militias’ effect upon civil war outcomes. It proposes that pro-regime militias involved in intrastate conflicts tend to act as proponents of ‘no peace, no war’, favouring low-activity violence and ceasefires over other conflict outcomes. These hypotheses are examined using an expanded dataset on pro-government militias and armed conflict in a statistical analysis of 229 civil war episodes from 1991 to 2015. These findings shed new light on the role of extra-state actors in civil wars.
`In' analytical NoteCooperation and Conflict Vol. 54, 1, Mar-2019; p64082
Journal SourceCooperation and Conflict 2019-03 54, 1
Key WordsArmed Groups ;  Conflict Outcome ;  Civil War ;  Extra-State