Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:728Hits:20123710Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID163583
Title ProperPragmatism and Practicality:
Other Title Informationrethinking U.S. Civil–Military Relations Models for a Turbulent Era
LanguageENG
AuthorPopescu, Ionut
Summary / Abstract (Note)In his recent article Saving Samuel Huntington and the Need for Pragmatic Civil–Military Relations, Travis proposes a model of civil–military relations based on “pragmatic civilian control.” This model has three main shortcomings. First, it does not adequately answer the question of “professional supremacy” versus “civilian supremacy” in making crucial decisions during wartime. Second, the distinctions between “wars of choice” and “wars of necessity,” and about the “kind of war” being fought, key theoretical variables mentioned by the author, are hard to judge objectively. And third, the new model would likely exacerbate rather than diminish the problem of military leaders getting involved in political and even partisan controversies; this is particularly problematic, given the unusual situation of many military leaders in the Trump administration occupying civilian positions of authority. If it is to be of practical use to policy makers, future scholarship on pragmatism and civil–military relations must address these weaknesses.
`In' analytical NoteArmed Forces and Society Vol. 45, No.1; Jan 2019: p.198-205
Journal SourceArmed Forces and Society Vol: 45 No 1
Key WordsMilitary Operations ;  Political Science ;  Civil–Military Relations ;  Defense Policy ;  Trump Administration


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text