| ID | 163751 |
| Title Proper | Refugees are not weapons |
| Other Title Information | the “Weapons of Mass Migration” Metaphor and Its Implications |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Marder, Lev |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In 2010, Kelly Greenhill published her highly acclaimed book Weapons of Mass Migration: Forced Displacement, Coercion, and Foreign Policy. In this article, I focus on the uses and implications of Greenhill's theory and specifically the metaphor Greenhill uses in place of “coercive engineered migration”—“weapons of mass migration.” The metaphor unmistakably links refugees to “weapons of mass destruction.” This should not be dismissed as just a phrase, considering that metaphors are one of the fundamental elements of thinking in international relations. Inquiring into the utility of the metaphor, I argue that associating refugees with weapons (1) weaponizes the metaphor against refugees, (2) frames the problem and possible solutions in a restrictive, securitized way that should be questioned, and (3) even undermines one of four policy options Greenhill herself proposes. After highlighting the merits of Greenhill's analysis and its embrace among far-right ideologues and conspiracy theorists, using Paul Chilton and George Lakoff's delineation of three utilities of metaphors in foreign policy, I analyze the “weapons of mass migration” metaphor. The article ends with a discussion of possible ways to mitigate the metaphor's effects and discusses alternative metaphors. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Studies Review Vol. 20, No.4; Dec 2018: p.576–588 |
| Journal Source | International Studies Review Vol: 20 No 4 |
| Key Words | Refugees ; Securitization ; Desecuritization ; Metaphors ; Foreign Policy |