| ID | 164160 |
| Title Proper | Domestic terrorism in democratic states |
| Other Title Information | understanding and addressing minority grievances |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Ghatak, Sambuddha |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Scholars continue to disagree on the relationship between regime type and political violence, perhaps because the empirical evidence remains contradictory. To date, most studies generally explore the direct relationship between democracy and terrorism. Yet, we think the effect of regime type on terrorism is conditional on the presence of politically excluded groups whose grievances motivate them to challenge the state. We need to take into account both willingness/grievance and opportunity to understand political violence. Using a global data set of domestic terrorism between 1990 and 2012, we find that different regime-associated features of democracy relate differently to domestic terrorism. Higher levels of the rule of law tend to decrease terrorism, whereas electoral democracies tend to experience more domestic terrorism. However, domestic terrorism increases in every form of democracy in the presence of political exclusion. As such, an effective counterterrorism policy must address underlying grievances as democratization by itself may actually drive domestic terrorism up. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 63, No.2; Feb 2019: p.439-467 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 63 No 2 |
| Key Words | Democracy ; Rule of Law ; Exclusion ; Domestic Terrorism ; Economic Discrimination |