| ID | 164835 |
| Title Proper | Case study research and critical IR |
| Other Title Information | the case for the extended case methodology |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Roccu, Roberto ; Lai, Daniela |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Discussions on case study methodology in International Relations (IR) have historically been dominated by positivist and neopositivist approaches. However, these are problematic for critical IR research, pointing to the need for a non-positivist case study methodology. To address this issue, this article introduces and adapts the extended case methodology as a critical, reflexivist approach to case study research, whereby the case is constructed through a dynamic interaction with theory, rather than selected, and knowledge is produced through extensions rather than generalisation. Insofar as it seeks to study the world in complex and non-linear terms, take context and positionality seriously, and generate explicitly political and emancipatory knowledge, the extended case methodology is consistent with the ontological and epistemological commitments of several critical IR approaches. Its potential is illustrated in the final part of the article with reference to researching the socioeconomic dimension of transitional justice in Bosnia and Herzegovina. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Relations Vol. 33, No.1; Mar 2019: p.67-87 |
| Journal Source | International Relations Vol: 33 No 1 |
| Key Words | Methodology ; Case Studies ; Critical International Relations ; Extended Case Methodology |