| ID | 164907 |
| Title Proper | Israel: ethnocracy or multicracy? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Shterenshis, Michael V |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Much of the recent academic literature that assesses democracy in Israel labels it either as incomplete or flawed, yet such literature employs minimal systematic analysis of how the state is actually governed. Since the 1990s, there has been a tendency to describe the Israeli political regime as an ethnocracy. This article argues that the term ‘ethnocracy’, when applied to Israel, has certain weaknesses and instead proposes the concept of ‘multicracy’ (multiformocracy) as a more appropriate term by which to describe Israel's political organization. It will demonstrate that existing Israeli democratic institutions do not control the state's policymaking in full and that several politically important processes are controlled or at least influenced by various other politically active forces. Whilst these forces can influence, stimulate, inhibit, and otherwise change governmental decisions and actions, they can be labeled as kratiae. While the capacity of Israel's democracy to govern is weak, these other kratiae can intervene in policymaking and the state's regime acts as democracy-dominated multicracy. |
| `In' analytical Note | Middle Eastern Studies Vol. 55, No.4; Jul 2019: p.605-620 |
| Journal Source | Middle Eastern Studies Vol: 55 No 4 |
| Key Words | Democracy ; Israel ; Political regime ; Ethnocracy ; Multicracy ; Typology Of Governments |