| ID | 164984 |
| Title Proper | Coercion and third-party mediation of identity-based conflict |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Eriksson, Jacob |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article analyses third-party mediation of identity-based conflicts, which are notoriously difficult to resolve. It seeks to reconcile the contradiction in the mediation literature between the need for less coercive strategies to ensure ownership of a peace agreement and the need for more coercive strategies to reach a final agreement. Through an analysis of mediation of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the article makes four contributions to existing literature. First, the article develops a theoretical ‘best fit’ model that proposes a u-shaped relationship between intensity of mediator coercion and transition through phases of negotiation. Second, it challenges the prevailing notion that pre-negotiation does not involve coercion. Third, it suggests that epistemological and ontological understandings of a conflict and the role of a mediator by both the mediator and the parties mean that mediators enjoy limited capacity to effectively shift from high- to low-coercive strategies. Multi-party mediation can provide the flexibility needed to execute the coercion u-curve effectively. Fourth, it challenges existing understandings of the US-mediated negotiations during the Annapolis process, 2007–08. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 45, No.3; Jul 2019: p.387-406 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol: 45 No 2 |
| Key Words | Mediation ; Israeli-Palestinian Conflict ; Coercion ; Identity-Based Conflict |