| ID | 165088 |
| Title Proper | From factions to fractions |
| Other Title Information | India’s foreign policy roles across different party systems |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Friedrichs, Gordon |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | India’s government under Narendra Modi represents a return to single party rule. This paper investigates whether and why single party governments in India differ in their extremity of foreign policies from coalition governments. It particularly focuses on how different forms of government influence the saliency, contestation, and enactment of national conceptions about India’s global role. First, I situate India within the academic debate regarding coalitional governments and foreign policy. I suggest that one reason why India challenges scholars‘ assumption is the missing link between partisan conceptions of India’s global role and their institutional representation. Second, I propose a role theoretical approach and argue that the process of self-identification, consisting of ego and anticipated alter expectations, conditions a state’s role set and extreme foreign policy. It is hypothesized that the nature of contestation of national role conceptions varies between factions and fractions because of the nature of India’s party system, as well as the relative significance of external others for India’s identity. Third, I examine instances of role-taking in the field of nuclearization and Sino-Indian relations. Findings suggest that contested role conceptions during single-party rule caused more extreme variances in international role-taking, while coalition governments proved to induce more complementary role-taking processes.
|
| `In' analytical Note | India Review Vol. 18, No.2; Jan-Feb 2019: p.125-160 |
| Journal Source | India Review Vol: 18 No 2 |
| Key Words | India’s Foreign Policy |