Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:498Hits:20838609Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID165161
Title ProperUntil the Bitter End? The Diffusion of Surrender Across Battles
LanguageENG
AuthorZhukov, Yuri M ;  Todd C. Lehmann and Yuri M. Zhukov ;  Lehmann, Todd C
Summary / Abstract (Note)Why do armies sometimes surrender to the enemy and sometimes fight to the bitter end? Existing research has highlighted the importance of battlefield resolve for the onset, conduct, and outcome of war, but has left these life-and-death decisions mostly unexplained. We know little about why battle-level surrender occurs, and why it stops. In this paper, we argue that surrender emerges from a collective-action problem: success in battle requires that soldiers choose to fight as a unit rather than flee, but individual decisions to fight depend on whether soldiers expect their comrades to do the same. Surrender becomes contagious across battles because soldiers take cues from what other soldiers did when they were in a similar position. Where no recent precedent exists, mass surrender is unlikely. We find empirical support for this claim using a new data set of conventional battles in all interstate wars from 1939 to 2011. These findings advance our understanding of battlefield resolve, with broader implications for the design of political-military institutions and decisions to initiate, continue, and terminate war.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Organization Vol. 73, No.1; Winter 2019: p.133-169
Journal SourceInternational Organization Vol: 73 No 1
Key WordsDiffusion of Surrender


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text