Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:420Hits:20814128Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID165258
Title ProperFlying to Fail
Other Title Informationcostly signals and air power in crisis bargaining
LanguageENG
AuthorPost, Abigail
Summary / Abstract (Note)Theories of crisis bargaining suggest that military mobilizations act as costly signals of resolve, increasing the credibility of coercive threats. In this article, I argue that air mobilizations, as a subset of military signals, demonstrate a lack of resolve during coercive bargaining for four reasons: they cost less in terms of human and financial resources (sunk costs), generate lower political costs (hand-tying), do not raise the risks of engagement (manipulation of risk), and do not significantly shift the balance of power—all compared with other military signals. Using new data that disaggregates military demonstrations into air, naval, and land signals during 210 cases of compellence, this article presents systematic evidence that air signals decrease the probability of coercive threat success compared with the alternatives. This finding holds important implications for theoretical and policy debates regarding the role of costly signals in international bargaining.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 63, No.4; Apr 2019: p.869-895
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol: 63 No 4
Key WordsInternational Security ;  Military Mobilization ;  Bargaining ;  Coercion ;  Compellence ;  Air Power


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text