Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:514Hits:19959909Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID165306
Title ProperExplicit Consideration of Unintended Consequences from Counterterrorism Policy
Other Title InformationThe Case of Radical Eco-Groups
LanguageENG
AuthorSafer-Lichtenstein, Aaron
Summary / Abstract (Note)Criminologists and terrorism specialists alike have conducted research on the deterrent effect of policies; however, to date, only criminologists have thoroughly examined the associated displacement of crime and diffusion of benefits. Using data from the Eco-Incidents Database, this study first examines the deterrent effect of government efforts targeting animal rights and environmental terrorism over several years. Next, it extends this application by examining nonterrorist actions by both terrorist groups and nonterrorist groups to see if deterrent actions have any unintended consequences. Results show no evidence of displacement, but rather that several government actions evidenced a diffusion of benefits.
`In' analytical NoteStudies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 42, No.4-6; Ape-Jun 2019: p.407-428
Journal SourceStudies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol: 42 No 4-6
Key WordsCounterterrorism Policy ;  Explicit Consideration ;  Radical Eco-Groups


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text