| ID | 165322 |
| Title Proper | Studying peace and studying conflict |
| Other Title Information | complementary or competing projects? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Gledhill, John ; Bright, Jonathan ; John Gledhill Jonathan Bright |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | “Peace” and (violent) “conflict” are often seen as conceptual mirror images of one another; peace is the absence of conflict, and conflict is the absence of peace. Given this conceptual interdependence, some scholars see that the study of war-making and the study of peacemaking are complementary—or even functionally identical—academic projects. Others, however, see that studies of violence and war-making are antithetic to studies of peace and peacemaking. The six contributions to this Journal of Global Security Studies forum explore these contrasting perspectives, with a view to assessing the “state of the discipline” of peace and conflict studies (and cognate disciplines, such as security studies). The introduction offers provocations for debate. The two contributions that follow consider connections and disconnections between the study of conflict and studies of postconflict peacebuilding and transitional justice, respectively. The next two contributions focus on areas of investigation that do not fit neatly into either the “peace” or “conflict” categories—gender and nonviolence—and the authors explore how studies of these topics might create bridges between scholarship on peace and studies of violent conflict. The concluding contribution argues that “mainstream” peace and conflict research has come to be dominated by positivist treatments of war and violence, and it draws attention to alternate approaches that have the potential to transform and ameliorate social relations. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Global security Studies Vol. 4, No.2; Apr 2019: p.259–266 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Global security Studies Vol: 4 No 2 |
| Key Words | Security Studies ; Peace and Conflict Studies ; State of The Discipline |