Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:457Hits:19951176Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID165473
Title ProperIntellectual Confession from a Member of the “Non-White” IR Community
Other Title Informationa friendly reply to david lake’s “white man’s IR”
LanguageENG
AuthorEun, Yong-Soo
Summary / Abstract (Note)David Lake wrote that International Relations (IR)1 will be a more diverse and better field of study if we embrace varied “life experiences and intuitions,” especially those of “marginalized” scholars, about politics and how the world works. Although concurring with his admonition, I also believe that his call for “greater diversity” in IR and his approach to realizing it need to be subject to critical scrutiny, being reconsidered in terms of reflexivity—more specifically, self-reflection by “marginalized” scholars. For this reason, as a “non-white” scholar working in a “non-Western” (or, in Lake’s words, “underrepresented”) IR community, I want to make my own confession to better understand what is at stake in promoting diversity in the academy from a different angle.
`In' analytical NotePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 52, No.1; Jan 2019: p.78-84
Journal SourcePolitical Science and Politics 2019-03 52, 1
Key WordsIR Community ;  Intellectual Confession