Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:426Hits:20671250Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID165490
Title ProperCoattails, Raincoats, and Congressional Election Outcomes
LanguageENG
AuthorRogers, Steven
Summary / Abstract (Note)More than 60 years ago, Angus Campbell offered an explanation for why the president’s party regularly loses congressional seats in midterm elections. He argued that peripheral voters “surge” to the polls in presidential elections and support the president’s congressional co-partisans but “decline” to turn out in the midterm. In his turnout-based explanation for midterm loss, Campbell speculated that “bad weather or an epidemic may affect the vote” but largely dismissed weather’s utility to test his theory (Campbell 1960, 399). I revisit Campbell’s speculation and employ a new identification strategy to investigate the “surge and decline” account of midterm loss. I show that as the costs of voting increase—due to above-average rainfall on Election Day—the strength of the relationship between presidential and congressional voting weakens.
`In' analytical NotePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 52, No.2; Apr 2019: p.251-255
Journal SourcePolitical Science and Politics 2019-06 52, 2
Key WordsCoattails ;  Raincoats ;  Congressional Election Outcomes