| ID | 165536 |
| Title Proper | Balancing game in the (indo)asia-pacific |
| Other Title Information | from ‘thucydides trap’ to multiple discourses? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Semul, A.S.M. Tarek Hassan |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The (re)emergence of China and the relative decline of the power of the United States (US) as the unipolar super power has shifted the geostrategic centre of gravity towards the Asia-Pacific region, also known in its extended form as Indo- Pacific region. Multiple new and frozen flashpoints have emerged in this region as China is increasingly seeking to tilt the power balance in its favour and the US is growing doubtful and impatient regarding the Chinese intentions. To mitigate the China threat, the US has already rebalanced its foreign policy under the Obama administration from the Middle East to the Pacific and current President Trump has extended the geographical reach of his new grand strategy of Free and Open Indo-Pacific to bring the Indian Ocean into play. One of the most predominant discourses that tries to explain this emerging great power relation and power transition is the ‘Thucydides Trap’. This discourse maintains a binary understanding that in a bipolar setting, the rise and decline of great powers make war inevitable. However, this oversimplified assumption may lead to a limited understanding of a region which has emerged with the support of the liberal order and slowly replacing the West as the epicentre of economic progress. This paper argues that there are ‘other discourses’ where middle and smaller regional powers not necessarily stranded between great power rivalry, rather they renegotiate the order in the (Indo)Asia-Pacific region to create multipolarity. On the contrary, the interdependence of the US and China in a globalized world compels the great powers to find ways to keep peace in the troubled waters of the Indo-Pacific. To find out to what extent all these discourses are intertwined and influence each other is another objective of this paper. |
| `In' analytical Note | BIISS Journal Vol. 39, No.3; Jul 2018: p.321-37 |
| Journal Source | BIISS Journal 2018-09 39, 3 |
| Key Words | Great Power ; Pivot to Asia ; Indo-Pacific Strategy ; Thucydides Trap ; -emergency of China |