| ID | 165602 |
| Title Proper | Why Ethnic Subaltern-Led Parties Crowd Out Armed Organizations |
| Other Title Information | Explaining Maoist Violence in India |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Chandra, Kanchan |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article asks why some Indian districts experience chronic Maoist violence while others do not. The answer helps to explain India’s Maoist civil war, which is the product of the accumulation of violence in a few districts, as well as to generate a new hypothesis about the causes of civil war more generally. The authors argue that, other things equal, the emergence of subaltern-led parties at the critical juncture before armed organizations enter crowds them out: the stronger the presence of subaltern-led political parties in a district at this juncture, the lower the likelihood of experiencing chronic armed violence subsequently. They develop their argument through field research and test its main prediction using an original, district-level data set on subaltern incorporation and Maoist violence in India between 1967 and 2008. The article contributes a new, party-based explanation to the literatures on both civil war and Maoist violence in India. It also introduces new district-level data on the Maoist movement and on the incorporation of subaltern ethnic groups by political parties in India. |
| `In' analytical Note | World Politics Vol. 71, No.2; Apr 2019: p.367-416 |
| Journal Source | World Politics 2019-03 71, 2 |
| Key Words | Violence ; India ; Patronage ; Clientelism ; Left ; Civil War ; Ethnic Parties ; Maoist Parties |