Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1576Hits:19738681Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID165664
Title ProperConsequences of excluding armed groups from peace negotiations
Other Title Informationchad and the Philippines
LanguageENG
AuthorGhais, Suzanne
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article examines the relationship between inclusion/exclusion of armed groups and the achievement of durable peace, using process tracing in two case studies: the peace process between the government of Chad and the rebel group Movement for Democracy and Justice in Chad, and the one between the government of the Philippines and the Moro National Liberation Front. The cases support theoretical arguments that excluded armed actors are more likely to renew armed confrontation after the peace accord. The study further elaborates the causal link: included armed rebels tend to negotiate for private benefits such as government posts and amnesty but also moderate their stances and emerge committed to the agreement; excluded armed actors lack any such commitment and still have unresolved grievances. They are thus more likely to renew armed action against the government.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Negotiation Vol. 24, No.1; 2019: p.61-90
Journal SourceInternational Negotiation Vol: 24 No 1
Key WordsArmed Conflict ;  Philippines ;  Chad ;  Rebel Groups ;  Peace Negotiation ;  Inclusivity ;  Civil War ;  Multiparty Negotiation


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text