| ID | 165782 |
| Title Proper | North Korea's "endgame" |
| Other Title Information | peaceful two-state solution or coercive unification? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Maass, Matthias |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Article Type: Commentary Essay Purpose—Much of the debate on North Korea assumes that Pyongyang would be truly satisfied with the overall status quo if it were only safe and secure enough. The purpose here is to argue that Pyongyang may instead be looking for reunification from a position of strength. Method—The short paper is built mostly on secondary-source research. It uses short historical case studies in addition to professional writings, both academic and journalistic. Findings—Overall, the argument is that Pyongyang has never abandoned the goal of unifying the peninsula under its own leadership. In fact, its "endgame" is a DPRK that spans the entire peninsula and unites the entire Korean people. Implications—To go forward and work with a nuclear North Korea towards a mutually agreeable long-term arrangement on the peninsula, understanding the long-term goals of Kim Jong Un is critical. The argument presented here may instill more caution in negotiation partners and statesmen/-women, especially in Seoul, Washington, and Tokyo, but also in Beijing and Moscow. |
| `In' analytical Note | North Korean Review Vol. 15, No.1; Spring 2019: p.109-117 |
| Journal Source | North Korean Review 2019-06 15, 1 |
| Key Words | Political ideologies ; Armed Forces ; Military Strategy ; Armed Conflict ; Coercion ; Territories ; Armistice ; Lead ; Invasion ; Unification Movements |