Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:567Hits:20080905Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID166149
Title ProperPortfolio allocation as the president's calculations
Other Title Informationloyalty, copartisanship, and political context in South Korea
LanguageENG
AuthorLee, Don S
Summary / Abstract (Note)How do the president's calculations in achieving policy goals shape the allocation of cabinet portfolios? Despite the growing literature on presidential cabinet appointments, this question has barely been addressed. I argue that cabinet appointments are strongly affected not only by presidential incentives to effectively deliver their key policy commitments but also by their interest in having their administration maintain strong political leverage. Through an analysis of portfolio allocations in South Korea after democratization, I demonstrate that the posts wherein ministers can influence the government's overall reputation typically go to nonpartisan professionals ideologically aligned with presidents, while the posts wherein ministers can exert legislators' influence generally go to senior copartisans. My findings highlight a critical difference in presidential portfolio allocation from parliamentary democracies, where key posts tend to be reserved for senior parliamentarians from the ruling party.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of East Asian Studies Vol. 18, No.3; Nov 2018: p.345-365
Journal SourceJournal of East Asian Studies Vol: 18 No 3
Key WordsEast Asia ;  South Korea ;  Minister ;  President ;  Portfolio Allocation ;  Presidential System ;  Cabinet Appointment


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text