| ID | 166866 |
| Title Proper | Rise and fall of counterproliferation policy |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Mauroni, Albert |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The US government initiated a Defense Counterproliferation Initiative to address the concern that, in the post-Cold War years, the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons would be widespread and create a significant challenge to the US military’s combat operations. In particular, non-nuclear states might use chemical or biological warfare agents against US forces with the belief that nuclear weapons would not be used against them in retaliation. Following the events of September 11, 2001, defense strategy and policy shifted to a wider view of the threat of adversarial use of “weapons of mass destruction” (WMD) and the term “counterproliferation” was replaced by “combating” or “countering WMD.” Over time, the Defense Department increasingly moved away from counterproliferation principles with the detrimental effect of losing capabilities that US forces still need for contemporary adversaries. This shift has been aggravated by other US government agencies’ use of “counterproliferation” in lieu of what would have been termed “nonproliferation” activities in the 1990s. The loss of clarity within the US government on these terms has led to the inability to focus the “whole of government” on this significant national security challenge. To alleviate this challenge, the US government needs a top-down initiative to refocus policy on the distinctly different aspects of WMD with respect to military combat operations, combating terrorism, and homeland security. |
| `In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 26, No.1-2; Feb-Mar 2019: p.127-141 |
| Journal Source | Nonproliferation Review Vol: 26 No 1-2 |
| Key Words | Defense Strategy ; US Defense Policy ; Weapons of Mass Destruction ; Counterproliferation Strategy ; Defining Wmd ; Counter-Wmd, |