Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:696Hits:19970564Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID167522
Title ProperDue Diligence and Overlooked Evidence in the South China Sea Arbitration: A Note
LanguageENG
AuthorWang, Peng ;  Guo, Jianping
Summary / Abstract (Note)In the South China Sea Arbitration, the Tribunal decided that China had not breached the due diligence obligation to protect and preserve the marine environment under Articles 192 and 194(5) of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea concerning Chinese fishers fishing with explosives, but that China had breached the same obligation regarding Chinese fishers harvesting endangered species. This article looks at how the Tribunal interpreted and applied the due diligence obligation and argues, from a Chinese perspective, that there were facts overlooked by the Tribunal that China could have presented to counter the evidence of the Philippines, which might have been enough to affect the decision on destructive fishing had China participated in the Arbitration.
`In' analytical NoteOcean Development and International Law Vol. 50, No.2-3; Apr-Sep 2019: p.235-242
Journal SourceOcean Development and International Law Vol: 50 No 2-3
Key WordsUnclos ;  marine Environment ;  IUU Fishing ;  South China Sea Arbitration ;  Due Diligence Obligation


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text