| ID | 167663 |
| Title Proper | American Perspectives and Blind Spots on World Politics |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Colgan, Jeff D |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Scholars of international relations (IR) from the United States, like any country, view the world with particular perspectives and beliefs that shape their perceptions, judgments, and worldviews. These perspectives have the potential to affect the answers to a host of important questions—in part by shaping the questions that get asked in the first place. All scholars are potentially affected by national bias, but American bias matters more than others. This special issue focuses on two issues: attention and accuracy in IR research. While previous scholarship has raised principally normative or theoretical concerns about American dominance in IR, our work is heavily empirical and engages directly with the field's mainstream neopositivist approach. The collected articles provide specific, fine-grained examples of how American perspectives matter for IR, using evidence from survey experiments, quantitative datasets, and more. Our evidence suggests that American perspectives, left unexamined, negatively affect our field's research. Still, the essays in this special issue remain bullish about the field's neopositivist project overall. We also offer concrete steps for taking on the problems we identify, and improving our field's scholarship. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Global security Studies Vol. 4, No.3; Jul 2019: p.300–309 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Global security Studies Vol: 4 No 3 |
| Key Words | Bias ; Methodological Nationalism ; Sociology of knowledge ; Global IR ; American Study of IR ; National Bias |