Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1029Hits:18636352Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID167800
Title ProperChanging nature of warfare
Other Title InformationRussian hybrid warfare in the 21st century
LanguageENG
AuthorBhuiyan, Mahbubur Rashid ;  Mahbubur Rashid Bhuiyan ;  Semul, A.S.M. Tarek Hassan
Summary / Abstract (Note)The nature and means of conducting warfare have always been changing. Technology, political realities and ideologies continue to play crucial role in this transformation as witnessed in the two world wars, the Cold War, and in following decades. Non-state actors became more visible and important. Nowadays, many wars involve such actors against state parties, for example, the US global war on terror, Israel-Hezbollah War (2006) and the current war against the Islamic State (ISIL). The term hybrid war involves a combination of traditional and nonconventional means, has become a common subject of discussion. But hybrid war is nothing new and has been practiced since ancient times. Several countries have now resorted to hybrid war: one such country is Russia, who has been blamed by western countries in this regard, e.g., in Georgian War (2008), Crimea (2014), ongoing conflict in eastern and south Ukraine, disinformation campaign against the West and interference in their governance process. Russia similarly, blames them for its destabilization by increased military presence on its borders and inciting revolutions in neighbour countries. Meanwhile, countries are developing hybrid warfare capacities, including plans for deploying military robots. Non-state actors now also use hybrid means like the Hezbollah or ISIL and several ongoing wars are becoming growingly hybrid; besides, the clash of ideologies, i.e., religious radicalism vs. white supremacism can create conflicts, indicating future wars may be even more so. Yet, some old mechanisms and strategies are likely to remain relevant and useful in future wars as well, suggesting their true ever-evolving and hybrid character.
`In' analytical NoteBIISS Journal Vol. 39, No.4; Oct 2018: p.339-358
Journal SourceBIISS Journal 2018-12 39, 4
Key WordsHybrid Warfare ;  Covert Operations ;  Russian Resurgence ;  Gersimov Doctrine