| ID | 168418 |
| Title Proper | Rule of law and maritime security |
| Other Title Information | understanding lawfare in the South China Sea |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Guilfoyle, Douglas |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Does the rule of law matter to maritime security? One way into the question is to examine whether states show a discursive commitment that maritime security practices must comply with international law. International law thus provides tools for argument for or against the validity of certain practices. The proposition is thus not only that international law matters to maritime security, but legal argument does too. In this article, these claims will be explored in relation to the South China Sea dispute. The dispute involves Chinese claims to enjoy special rights within the ‘nine-dash line’ on official maps which appears to lay claim to much of the South China Sea. Within this area sovereignty remains disputed over numerous islands and other maritime features. Many of the claimant states have engaged in island-building activities, although none on the scale of China. Ideas matter in such contests, affecting perceptions of reality and of what is possible. International law provides one such set of ideas. Law may be a useful tool in consolidating gains or defeating a rival's claims. For China, law is a key domain in which it is seeking to consolidate control over the South China Sea. The article places the relevant Chinese legal arguments in the context of China's historic engagement with the law of the sea. It argues that the flaw in China's approach has been to underestimate the extent to which it impinges on other states' national interests in the maritime domain, interests they conceptualize in legal terms. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Affairs Vol. 95, No.5; Sep 2019: p.999–1017 |
| Journal Source | International Affairs Vol: 95 No 5 |
| Key Words | Maritime Security ; South China Sea ; Rule of Law ; Understanding Lawfare |